|
Post by wb2ymc on Jan 20, 2016 2:51:36 GMT
I think (again) you guys have to hang in there. It will be worth the wait....good things are coming..trust me on this.
I was right the last time if you remember.
My gut is usually right..
|
|
|
Post by vroom on Jan 20, 2016 3:46:40 GMT
Your gut has an amazing sense of timing, wb
|
|
fedup
New Member
Posts: 22
|
Post by fedup on Jan 22, 2016 15:34:55 GMT
When a company promises things will happen just to get investor money and those things don't happen it really boils down to misrepresentation of the facts. This is what Scuderi has continually done to raise the 80 million plus. They more or less have duped their investors. So I guess that is acceptable in today's world...buyer beware! I still think there has to be some law(s) in place that will get these people. The current lawsuit against this company will hopefully prove this out and they will get what they deserve. I'm sure at this time they are trying to hide as much of their (our) assets as possible before they go belly up. For some people to be optimistic with this company makes no sense and have probably used their play money so they really don't care ..... I did not. I didn't hear or ever see Scuderi saying to invest ONLY PLAY MONEY. I invested money that was hard earned and I feel cheated by the false information that Scuderi consistently put out.
|
|
|
Post by gman on Jan 23, 2016 17:54:17 GMT
Not sure what Sally, fedup and vroom read and signed when investing in SG?
SG Offering Memorandum page 12, paragraph III Risk Factors states -
The Units being offered are speculative, involve a high degree of risk, and should only be purchased by those who can afford to lose their entire investment in the Company's securities. Therefore, prospective purchasers should carefully consider the following risk factors before making any investment decision. Any of the following risks could adversely and materially affect the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations and, as a result, the value of the Units may decline substantially. Investors should consult with their own financial, legal and tax advisors prior to subscribing for Units.
Memorandum goes on to list/discuss Development Stage Business, Failure of Company's Products to Perform, and Dependence on Management among other risks/concerns.
Not wanting to get into a pissing contest, but a few investors need to put SG investment into perspective. And vroom, you don't know me or know what I do for a living. I will say I am not part of SG management, or an insider (whatever that means), just an investor.
Wishing SG and every SG investor a prosperous 2016
|
|
Sally
Full Member
Posts: 105
|
Post by Sally on Jan 23, 2016 22:19:20 GMT
OMG gman, I wanted to leave this alone but you keep coming back for more. Sit down and read this very carefully.
I did NOT ask for a buyout, RUTH OFFERED IT TO ME SO I WOULD GO AWAY. Apparently I was saying some things on the original blog site that were either hitting too close to home and were true. Everything I said in 2012 is still true today so I guess I was correct in my summations about SG back then.
Please don't come back to me with "SG Offering Memorandum page 12, paragraph III Risk Factors states" blah, blah, blah or "Memorandum goes on to list/discuss Development Stage Business, Failure of Company's Products to Perform, and Dependence on Management among other risks/concerns."
I know all that and never asked for a buyout....RUTH OFFERED IT TO ME TO GET RID OF ME. SHE OFFERED IT OVER 2 1/2 YEARS AGO AND I'M STILL WAITING FOR HER TO CONTACT ME WITH THE DETAILS.
My issue with the SG is they continue to promise things and NEVER deliver.
Hope you understand it this time. Not sure where you live but I'm guessing the snow is keeping you inside with extra time on your hands so you thought you would spend it coming back with a ridiculous post like the one you sent a short while ago. To repeat, I never asked for a buyout.
Now go play nice.
PS - WB2ymc, can you be more specific about "I was right the last time if you remember."
|
|
|
Post by vroom on Jan 24, 2016 0:04:49 GMT
Sally was nice. I won't be. Man you are retarded. If you don't know what insider means in the context of corporate finance, you are not suitable to have bought scoured in the first place. The money I have in scoured means absolutely nothing to me. I have no complaints about a risky investment going to zero. That has happened to me many times in a lifetime of professional investing. The point is not the risk, it is the breach of fiduciary responsibility and its impact on people like you who are being taken advantage of because you do not know better. Just so you know, the management team here has behaved very very very very badly. To give you a sense, we are talking Worldcom, Enron badly not too many trips in the corporate jet. It is hard to argue with you because, while I do not know what you do, I am certain that you do not know what you are talking about. That, or you are an insider.
|
|
|
Post by vroom on Jan 24, 2016 0:22:32 GMT
I actually snorted at the imagery of old Gman and his A-ha moment. Fishing through his papers from (what is for me) 10 years ago and thumbing through the OM. G, you did make me laugh
|
|
|
Post by gman on Jan 25, 2016 2:42:05 GMT
O M G Sally, that's your rebuttal/reply to my post? "My issue with the SG is they continue to promise things and NEVER deliver." "Please don't come back to me with "SG Offering Memorandum page 12, paragraph III Risk Factors states" blah, blah, blah'
It's the blah, blah, blah you don't get Sally Go play nice? Go read and understand what you got into you before you go mouthing off your diatribe, you psychotic lunatic. Double up on yours meds before you repost again how Ruth promised you your money back.
As for you vroom, snortster boy "To give you a sense, we are talking Worldcom, Enron badly" Really?....Worldcom and Enron? Shows me your true intellect. Comparing SG to Wordcom and Enron...Seriously? Take a moment to think through your thoughts before you start spouting off. Being nice here Sally, I could have a field day with the two of you if I really wanted to. Not wasting my time replying to you two pathethic investors any further....may investing in SG teach you two, not to get in over your head in future investments.
|
|
|
Post by vroom on Jan 27, 2016 1:17:02 GMT
Well, in the last webinar Sal stated they were closing a PPA with Johnson controls on long island . Johnson is merging with Tyco and moving its HQ off long island to Ireland. What happens to tha PPA? Well old G. That's where you are uninformed as I do know what I am talking about. If the blah blah blah said that they were going to misappropriate funds to non business purposes, I suppose that you are right. Perhaps it's more like tyco. I can help you with all 3 if you need it.
|
|
|
Post by dan27 on Jan 27, 2016 20:11:55 GMT
Not sure what this merger has to do with scuderi, if anything at all. They can still do business and possibly get a better deal in the process.
|
|
|
Post by vroom on Jan 27, 2016 23:52:42 GMT
nothing. i was talking shower curtains. I will keep getting more obscure with references until you guys conceded that this is just not right.
|
|
|
Post by dan27 on Jan 28, 2016 1:30:08 GMT
fine
|
|
|
Post by toyota on Jan 30, 2016 19:40:13 GMT
whatever happened to the 2014 PPA with the 13 AHIS casinos in Mexico? are they generating power yet?
|
|
|
Post by vroom on Jan 30, 2016 22:04:42 GMT
Methane gas power
|
|
|
Post by vroom on Jan 30, 2016 22:06:53 GMT
They are building a model. Either that, or, it seems that the engine technology can be used to power a rocket that is instrumental to settling Mars. It's the next big thing. IPO in 5 years will be bigger than Uber. In fact they have developed the motor so much that it does not need a motor.
|
|